Tuesday, 10 June 2014

Avon & Somerset Greed


According to the Bristol Post "Fresh arguments have erupted over the effectiveness of speed cameras, after it was announced that the yellow boxes in South Gloucestershire could be turned back on." Avon & Somerset Police want to turn them back on, "despite data showing accident rates at camera sites have not changed since they have been off."

This is because Avon and Somerset Police have no interest whatsoever in actual police work, especially if it means getting up from behind a desk. All around the Avon & Somerset region police stations are closing as the force is centralised.  Even Bath is losing its police station and will now be served by Bristol. Bath is a city in its own right with unique policing needs but Avon & Somerset doesn't think so.

This is due to the effectiveness of their new policing strategy, whereby if a crime is reported and a government agency is not the "victim", they passs the buck onto voluntary organisations and close down the case without investigating.  They have discovered that if they don't look for crime, they will not find it - which explains a huge drop in crime in the region.

From now on Avon & Somerset Police will now take up a new role as a feeder agency for petty & victimless crimes courts which generate up to £10,000 in revenue per offence. Magistrates will be replaced by a speak-your-weight machine also capable of handing out fines

Community safety and public order has proven inefficient and expensive - and it's a total mugs game when you can sit behind a desk taking no risks for the same money. The plebs might whinge a bit but who are they going to complain to who cares? Not their MP, and certainly not their police commissioner.

If this model proves successful I suggest a merger with the HMRC, for it is difficult to tell the difference between the two agencies already - and if it means fewer fat, tattooed uniformed thugs on the street, then I'm all for it.

Monday, 9 June 2014

RIP to the original complete B'stard

Alan Beresford B'stard: Role model and childhood hero.

Friday, 6 June 2014

Game over for the Cult of Farage


I feel obliged to pass comment on the Newark by-election, though in many respects I there is no need. It's game over.  The tide has been and gone. Newark was a safe Tory seat and by the looks of it still is. Ukip failed. You couldn't really get more typical traditional Tory than Roger Helmer and if any candidate was going to swing it for Ukip, it was he, but this has not happened. And this time around Ukip cannot complain about lack of exposure. They lost fair and square.

Of course that dynamic may have been different were it a marginal seat, but that's just the luck of the draw. That elusive holy grail of a Westminster seat escapes them once more and now the game shifts up a gear.

Ed Miliband has categorically said there will be no EU referendum under a Labour government so the time for playing games is over. There is a clear choice at the ballot box now.  Either you want a referendum or you don't. Thus Ukippers have some soul searching to do. Does their tribe matter more than their country? It is for this reason a great many will hold their noses and vote Tory, and it will be the one thing on offer that will get non-voters out of the house, myself included. This time I do have a dog in the fight. There is an offer of a referendum so I am going to take them up on it.

If the prediction of a surge in turnout holds true, though we will see an improved performance by Ukip on the last general election, it won't be enough to make the difference. Ukip benefits from low turnouts, but the coming election will not be one of those. The next general election will be the first in a generation where the outcome matters and we will see the Lib Dems and Ukip squeezed out.

Having failed to make any significant gains Ukip will be on the retreat. But in any case, if the grail of grails is to leave the EU, a even a strong showing by Ukip is a shot in the foot. At best Ukip will eat into Tory marginals which is wholly counter-productive. They will not be forgiven for putting Miliband into Downing Street and costing us a referendum. Here Ukip should think very carefully about the possibilities if they wish to survive at all.

The task ahead is now to win the debate on leaving the EU, getting a referendum and winning it. That said, even if we win, leaving the EU is only the beginning. It is only a stepping stone on the road to democracy. We will still need a pro-democracy party. If Ukip wants to be that party it has only a short time to act.

If Ukip really does want to play for power, then the next three years should be about consolidation. It needs to go about deciding what it believes in, coming back with a strong set of policies consistent with those beliefs and a genuine alternative to the EU. It then needs a strategy, and the discipline to stick to it, even if that means letting go of a third of its members by committing to a controversial philosophy. Movements need strong ideas, patience and strategy. Flash in the pan populism is a bust and Ukip has proven that.

If we win a referendum and leave the EU, Ukip will need serious answers to serious questions, and if we lose that referendum, we will need to build a new pro-democracy movement - and it has to be more than a generic protest vote. It has to be built on a solid foundation of ideas.

But that is a big if. It all depends on the performance of the exit campaign. We will have to win the argument decisively and have good answers to tough questions. On that score Ukip isn't helpful. The boorish, dogmatic, unpleasant and aggressive behaviour of Ukip activists online is a huge turn off and, like the "CyberNats", they are more liability than asset. The same can be said of Nigel Farage.

If Ukip wants to help win that referendum then getting rid of Farage would be a huge boost. Alex Salmond has come to be the ambassador of the Yes campaign in Scotland and that is why they will lose. That same dynamic may happen in an EU referendum and the last thing we need is showboating prats like Nigel Farage (who don't know what they are talking about) appropriating the campaign for their own egotistical ends.

I have repeatedly observed on this blog that the margin to win an EU referendum is small and it is a referendum us eurosceptics could very well lose. Mistakes we cannot afford and liabilities like Farage we do not need. Debating Nick Clegg is one thing, but debating the nation is another.

Ukip needs to ask tough questions of itself. It cannot hold together as a generic dustbin for protest votes and Farage's appeal has peaked. His conduct in the coming months could well kill Ukip stone dead, and if he doesn't - the lack of ideology and policy will. It's crunch time for Ukip and it needs to get serious. If Ukip won't get serious it should get out of the way and make room for a movement that will.

If we want Britain to be an independent, sovereign, democratic nation, trading freely with the world, then tribal loyalties must come second, and Ukippers need to think hard on how serious they are about leaving the EU. What is more important? A couple of MP's at best, or an EU referendum?

Thursday, 5 June 2014

Forgive me if I sounds a little sarcastic

James Delingpole: Gramscian Marxist Stooge
Quite obviously James Delingpole is a Tory stooge, a communist and a defender of the LibLabCon. He is obviously out to get Ukip, and it's all just sour grapes because he didn't get selected to be an MEP.

It could also be that he is a plant working for MI5 - and Breitbart London is a cover for the Gramscian-Marxist Agenda, a side-project of Common Purpose, and funded by the European Commission.

Traitor Delingpole writes...
Discussing this with one of UKIP's Young Turks Michael Heaver on the Spectator podcast, I wasn't terribly reassured by his response. UKIP, apparently, are going to wheel out all manner of splendid, thought-through policies which we're all going to love when they bring out their new manifesto, come the Autumn conference season. But policy detail is the obsession of wonks, not real people. What those of us in the normal world want to know most of all is this: What does UKIP actually believe in? This matters because if UKIP doesn't have a coherent ideology then a) it will be just like all the other parties which have long since jettisoned any last vestige of principle and b) it will find it impossible to justify and defend its positions with any intellectual consistency.
Another MSM smear. He concludes with...
I hope I'm wrong - but if I'm right about this, then UKIP are never going to shake up the political system in the way some of us hoped. They're just going to give it a gentle slap and tickle, before joining the cosy club.
Quite obviously he is being unhelpful - and not very constuctive, and Ukippers should now give him a wide berth, ignore his blog and stop commenting on Breitbart. To Coventry with him. He should be duly deferential and supportive, and not say these horrid things about the party that is causing an earthquake in British politics.

Nothing of that nature has EVER been said even on this blog. Honest!

James Delingpole, get thee to a nunnery!

The Taxpayers Alliance are part of the problem

As our political masters and pathetic media once again ponder taxing plastic bags, one wonders if they occupy the same planet as the rest of us. Last week it was reported that council tax arrears is now the biggest debt problem reported to Citizens Advice.

"New figures have revealed between January and March one in five people reporting debt problems to the charity had a council tax arrears issue. In the first three months of this year 27,000 people with a council tax arrears problem got help from Citizens Advice – a 17% increase on the same period last year."

So much so, that even councillors appear to be falling behind. An unnamed Sutton councillor had to be threatened with court over unpaid council tax while nine others had to be reminded to pay up last year. Andy Silvester, of campaign group the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "It costs the council money to chase up late payments and councillors should really know better. "Every penny of avoidable spending unnecessarily puts up local residents' council taxes."

It is Andy Silvester who should know better. A Freedom of Information request this morning reveals that my local authority alone netted £412,22 last year in "costs" from council tax Liability Orders. The council charges £55 for the act of sending a letter. The law allows only for "reasonable costs", but councils clearly disregard this and use arrears as a source of revenue. Further to this, it has also collected nearly £10k in credit card surcharges on those payments.

Moreover, it does not cost councils anything to chase up late payments because councils themselves do not do the chasing. They instead subcontract to the multi-million pound enforcement industry who are allowed by law to charge £310 simply for knocking on the door. There is big money to be made from council tax arrears and it is a handy source of income for councils and bailiffs alike. There is no link between the relatively small amount of council tax arrears and cuts to council budgets, which are in themselves minuscule - even in these times of so-called austerity.

It is bad enough that our Uncle Tom media uncritically report what they are told, but rent-a-quotes like Silvester mouthing fact-free platitudes is not very helpful. The TPA is supposed to be an organisation that sticks up for taxpayers and advocates low taxes, but all too often can seen in our local rags cheering on the rampant greed of councils. They speak the same language as rags like the Daily Mail who, on the basis of figures cooked up by private bailiffs, claim that "Council tax bills could be cut by an average £100 per household if authorities chased up debts properly." - The message being that "council tax dodgers" increase the burden on others. This is not so.

Jean Baptiste Colbert, a French finance minister once said “The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing”. If we had anything approaching democracy, taxation would never have reached present levels, and councils would not be running deficits to fund their CEOcracy, their vanity projects, their final-salary-pensions and worthless non-jobs. So in the absence of democracy it is time to hiss, and those who do are the canary-down-the-mine who prevent bills soaring ever upward.

But mostly, those who don't pay are those who can't pay, yet TPA is egging on councils to be as greedy as possible, when every council has a moral obligation to reduce its footprint on our wallets. If thousands of people are being summoned to court in every authority, each accumulating further debt of up to £85 each time (before it is even sent to bailiffs), then it is a broken system and it is exploiting the poorest. If the TPA had a genuine concern for taxpayers it would be campaigning to stop councils pushing the poorest deeper into debt - and to stop profiteering from it.

While council tax benefit changes have caused an upsurge in council tax arrears, councils do have the authority to write off this debt, and should make cuts elsewhere. As the TPA is very often keen to point out, there is plenty fat to be trimmed and still an army of non-jobbers to fire, yet they join the ranks of the other Uncle Toms in calling for councils to be more aggressive in stripping the public of their every last penny. With friends like the TPA, who needs enemies?

Wednesday, 4 June 2014

A big thank you to my readers


Regular readers will be aware of my campaign against council tax and local authority bailiffs. I certainly gave them a run for their money and I did score a few points. They are extra careful when dealing with me now - and so they should.

This year the fight goes on and I have set a trap for the council (which I shall not detail just yet), but I am definitely not walking away from the fight. I have just changed tactics and hopefully I will drag the mainstream media into it this year. 

Though I lost the case, it cost the state easily five times what it cost me, which is half the point of the campaign. If I have no voice in how my money is spent then I will dictate it by other means. That said, it was a very expensive process, and I now face £1300 in costs. I am greatly amused that of the £1300, the bailiffs only get £45 - considerably less than they charge, and that is a small victory in itself.

Howsoever, that bill is not so much a concern since I can take my time paying it (and I am in full time employment), but the cost of representation was a big bill I could have done without. I am happy to say that donations via the other blog have been overwhelmingly generous and far exceeded that which was ever expected. I am truly stunned and humbled by your support, and more than anything it lets me know that this was worth the two years of aggravation and hassle. So for now, all there is to say is a huge thank you to all of you who contributed and read the blog.

Finally, I would just like to point out that the magistrates court where I was originally convicted lost a days trade this week due to an arson attack. I regret to inform Avon & Somerset Police that my alibi is watertight.

A myopic fixation with London

Spiked today makes the case that London will never be ‘full up’. "Ignore the miserabilism about London's population hitting 10million - this great city can handle it." writes Patrick Hayes. You have to admire his optimism. I don't doubt that London can cope and that we can expand it, but it's going to take a lot of engineering, a lot of disruption and a lot of other people's money. It can be done for sure. But do we really want to?

The growth of London comes at the expense of everywhere else. Like immigration, domestic migration to London must at be least managed, not least least because we haven't the water or power infrastructure - and transport isn't coping under the pressure. A Friday afternoon on the M25 tells you that much - and for all it is widened at great expense, greater capacity is soon absorbed by ever more traffic. Even if we do build more supposedly "affordable" houses near London, it won't be very long before those properties are also out of reach for ordinary people too. We know this because that is precisely what happened the last time the government built Garden Cities in the South East. Those they were promised to couldn't afford them.

Moreover why cram the whole population into the South East? It makes no sense. The Leeds/Bradford/Manchester conurbation could easily be given tax autonomy so as to compete with London - and that would take a lot of pressure off London infrastructure. There is simply no reason to expand London - and there is every advantage in developing the North and Midlands. The fact that London is expanding is actually a major failure of government.

Whenever you look at immigration you have to look at the push and pull factors. The same applies to London. The pull is jobs and opportunity because the regions have been de-industrialised and agriculture is mechanised. Consequently the young go where the money and opportunity is - London.

By maintaining a centralised state, the media the follows power - thus all media and culture is London focused, which is another part of the pull factor. Young political types are attracted to London and can name every minister - but couldn't tell you who the mayor of their hometown is. Why would you get involved in local politics if there is no power in local politics? While the regions have no sovereignty over their own affairs, and are run by Whitehall, anyone who's an expert on anything also has to go to London to be heard. And that's why we get one-size-fits-all rubbish policies that only work for London. (see Bedroom Tax)

There is a lot we can do to slow the growth of London, and instead develop other cities like Birmingham, which are great places in their own right. We could start by opening up the skies and having better intercity connections by air. Why can't I fly from Leeds to Bristol? And why is it more expensive to go to Bristol from Edinburgh than it is to go from Edinburgh to Rome?

There is more to the UK than just London. The UK is a diverse and exciting place and a lot of groundbreaking culture has come from our other cities. Why then expand London and allow everywhere else to slowly rot?

It's hardly Malthusian to suggest limiting the growth of London to stop Birmingham, Glasgow and Manchester becoming the new Detroits, and it's not NIMBYism to suggest the South East needs green spaces - and shouldn't be plastered with yet more concrete.

Monday, 2 June 2014

Breitbart has lost the plot

Breitbart: Low grade Ukip toss-rag.
I had not intended for this blog to be relentlessly critical of Ukip, but for the moment Ukip is news, and as someone who wants Britain to leave the EU, Ukip is a significant part of my sphere of interest. Its performance, or the lack thereof, is paramount.

For a party that has allegedly caused an earthquake in British politics, you would think they would have updated their website by now, but it has not - for a whole five days. But never ye mind! Breitbart London is now doing a better of job of being the Ukip website.

Today Raheem Kassam complains that "The media has been quick to press Nigel Farage on all his policies for everything else, conveniently forgetting that none of the other major political parties have disclosed their manifesto commitments for the 2015 General Election. But that's okay, right? It's Farage."

Rather missing the point methinks. Y'see we know what we are getting from the mainstream parties; pretty much more of the same. In Ukip we have an upstart party promising to sweep out the rot and restore Britain (and politics in general) to its former glory.  So we might well then enquire what it has in mind. If we are to have a grand revolution, it might be a good idea for them to spell out what they intend to do.

Kassam writes that "While all that is occurring on TV screens and in newspaper columns, cyberkippers (UKIP supporters with computers) are debating what platforms the party should stand on at the next election. Journalists would do well to plug into these conversations that are taking place in web forums and on Facebook: they reveal a depth to your average kipper that often goes unreported."

Does he realise what he is saying here? If we wish to know what Ukip is about then we must trawl the comments and forums to pick up on what Ukip supporters are suggesting as policy? Are we supposed to take this (and Ukip) seriously?

Moreover, he cherry-picks two anonymous commenters from which to draw his conclusion that "The party is making inroads into 'conservative at heart, with a libertarian streak' territory – just the sort of live and let live philosophy that the Conservatives used to stand for under Margaret Thatcher."  This in the same week Farage himself has gone to great lengths to distance Ukip from Thatcherism.

In fact, Ukip has distanced itself from a great many of the suggested policies over the years (namely flat tax), to the point where I have a great deal of difficulty working out if it stands for anything at all, apart from an ill-defined ambition to leave the EU and to slow immigration. If Ukippers themselves do not know what they are voting for, why on earth should we follow?

But supposing we were to take Kassam seriously, you only have to spend five minutes looking at Ukipper comments on The Telegraph to know that Ukippers range from illiterate reactionary bores to the downright nasty. If these people are the measure by which we are supposed to judge Ukip then the mainstream media is not that far off the mark. 

Of course it would be nice to raise these points with Breitbart readers, but Breitbart has now adopted The Guardian's moderation policy: delete contrary opinions and ban the user. That is rather a pity. I had high hopes for a Breitbart UK operation, but if being a tabloid propaganda vessel for Ukip is the height of their ambition then it can simply go on the ignore list. That said, this is entirely redundant if Raheem Kassam is what passes as worthy commentary.

If that is the lofty standard I must reach then perhaps I should close this humble blog and instead run a gushing Ukip fan-boy site. It would get ten times the readers, a pat on the head by The Great Leader - and retweets aplenty from fawning admirers. Maybe even become an MEP one day? Integrity is a waste of time, that's for damn sure.

Sunday, 1 June 2014

Like lambs to the slaughter


As reported by The Guardian, Ukip have now hinted at a set of policies. Nigel Farage has declared he wants to see a grammar school in every town and cut the top rate of tax to 40p.  One could discuss the various issues therein, but that would be redundant.  If these policies are a taste of what is to come then there is nothing to moisten the undergarments over, unless you're a Ukip tribalist. They will now be busy dreaming up justifications for any utterence made by the tribe - no matter how absurd and at odds with their own politics.

What we are looking at here is essentially more of the same top-down policy tinkering rather than a radical overhaul of government. It offers us nothing but the same small adjustments within the same narrow parameters. Tis nothing but timid accountancy. They are playing it safe, so as not to frighten the horses. Anything beyond playing safe would soon shine a light through the many cracks within their diverse and disparate membership.

What it says is that Ukip has no grand idea to sell. They are just a different set of grubby mits seeking the levers of power. The reality of Ukip does not match the sentiment.  This is still very much establishment politics and business as usual. Another party wanting to pull our stings for reasons they know not why.

If anyone were under the illusion that Ukip were an alternative to mainstream politics, this ought to be enough to finally shatter it. And if not, perhaps the news that Ukip's housing spokesman, Andrew Charalambous (Dr. Evil), has admitted making money from immigrants on housing benefit. An investigation by the Mirror and the GMB union discovered that Mr Charalambous' company, Woodlands Estates Limited, made £745,315 in welfare pay-outs from Haringey Council last year, the largest amount earned by a private landlord.

That's right. Ukip's housing spokesman is a welfare baron who coincidentally wants to scrap the "Bedroom Tax".  No vested interest there at all. There is of course no mention of any of this on the Ukip website, which has not been updated since last Thursday. They are still asleep at the wheel.

For some time I have been predicting that Ukip will slide back into oblivion.  I say so because it has no informing principles that drive its policy making, and it is riding high on a wave of populism rather than a real idea.  If ever it does pick a side and push an idea, it will fragment. Farage knows this, hence why these policy announcements are so pedestrian. It may be that Ukip is with us for a while longer, but the longer it stays in business, the more it becomes that which it set out to replace.  It is leading its followers like lambs to the slaughter.

Insufferable though Ukipists have been since the Euro-elections, it is set to get worse. The Newark by-election will yield strong results for Ukip, feeding the delusion that Ukip is going places.  Roger Helmer was an astute pick for Newark (a Tory safe seat) and they will throw everything they have at this contest. But my money is on this contest being the last hurrah for Ukip - if the Tories play their cards rights.

A strong showing for Ukip at Newark will focus minds sharply.  We will be faced with a narrow contest at the general election where the prospect of Ed Miliband as PM is be realistic. With clear blue water between Labour and the Tories we could see a large surge in turnout to prevent that, especially if an EU referendum is on the table. This would be consistent with turnout trends. Ukip's vote share is then reduced significantly as we see a classic two party squeeze.

To maintain momentum, Ukip will have to broaden its appeal even more in a short time without losing its current base. I don't think this possible. Having run a populist campaign and painted itself as the BNP-lite, I think Ukip has now reached the limits of their appeal. They have had a full public airing and now everybody knows who they are. Opinion is largely polarised and you are either with them or against them. Anyone who was going to vote Ukip already has. With voter segmentation already showing that 17% (or more) Ukip euro-votes likely not going to Ukip in a general election, along with a surge in turnout, it looks like game over for the Cult of Farage.

I have said there may be one or two surprises, but I may even find cause to revise that view over the coming year.  It is after the election that we will see the slow death of Ukip. Having manifestly demonstrated its inability to break into the mainstream voters will begin to switch off, and if Ukip do score any MP's they will be such godawful people they will send people away in droves. All we can hope is that the air-headed pronouncements of Farage in the run up to a referendum to not blow our chances of leaving the EU - which are already slim.

One way or the other, I will just be glad it's over. We may or may not be closer to leaving the EU, but we will have finally put to bed the notion that the present system of "democracy" can produce meaningful change. It will soon be glaringly obvious that our voting rituals are rigged so as to prevent the people from having a voice. While starting and growing a party from nothing to the size of Ukip is a tremendous achievement, in the final analysis, it accomplishes very little. You can't prevent a ship from sinking by changing the captain. We shall have to take power by other means.

That won't be easy. When so many Ukippers have invested heart and soul into their brand and their tribe, and invested so much love in the leader with unquestioning devotion, it will be difficult for them to let go. We can expect them to be aggressive like a cornered rat, holding true to their collective delusion as though it were a lifebelt in a raging storm. Sadly, they will have to learn the hard way that change doesn't come playing establishment games by establishment rules - and there are no shortcuts on the road to freedom.

Wednesday, 28 May 2014

Predatory behaviour: Give us your wonga

Predatory behaviour: Give us your wonga
Councils up and down the land have been leading the fight against "predatory" pay-day loan companies, even calling for their websites to be banned on council owned computers.

Plymouth Councillor Chris Penberthy, Cabinet Member for Cooperatives and Community Development, said: “This work is so very important – it directly affects the household finances of some of the city’s most cash-strapped people. These are households that have to take short-term loans to survive week by week and month by month. So to help them break free from such vicious cycles of debt is absolutely the right thing to do.

However, following this moral crusade we now learn that council tax arrears are driving more people to seek help than any other form of debt, according to the charity Citizens Advice. In the first three months of this year, the charity helped 27,000 people who had fallen behind with council tax bills, a 17% increase on the same period of 2013, and one in five of those reporting debt problems had an arrears issue.

So in fact, it is government that creates more debt problems than payday loan companies. So much so, we need a charity to handle the many thousands of cases. Moreover, councils are the number one employer of predatory, law breaking bailiffs.  From fee fraud through to unlawful entry, misrepresentation of powers and extortion, council employed private sector "enforcement agents" have spawned a cottage industry devoted to dealing clearing up this mess - and neither the police or councils have the remotest interest in addressing it (as I have discovered at great expense).

We are told that enforcement is only used as a "last resort" but we are only in May and already I have received my summons, where I will doubtlessly be joining thousands of others in my locality alone. Meanwhile councils are profiteering from these summons's, with each summons carrying a charge of £85 when the law only provides for "reasonable costs". The are waging a covert war against the people, netting millions from this scam.

We are told that councils need a "proactive approach to the enforcement of council tax to ease the financial burden on taxpayers, while protecting revenue for vital public services on which vulnerable people depend".

I found one of Plymouth's "vulnerable people" to confirm this. Plymouth Chief Executive Tracey Lee will only earn £150,000 this year, and is forced by circumstance to earn £20,000 less than her predecessor. Obviously the downward pressure on wages also extends to our CEOcracy.

Since I have a court fine of over £1300 to cover last years council tax dispute, I think I may resort to a pay-day loan to stave off enforcement this year. Good job this isn't a council owned computer huh? 

UPDATE: South Gloucestershire Council charges £85 for £0.09p Council Tax arrears.  I hope Wonga.com will point this out to councils the next time these self-righteous people grind their axe.

Tuesday, 27 May 2014

London calling?

In reference to their apparently poor performance in London, Ukip spokeswoman Suzanne Evans on Radio 4 seemed to agree with the host, that they had difficulty appealing to the "educated, cultural and young".

There's a more obvious answer to this. London politics works for London people. London gets what it wants, but the rest of the country can basically get stuffed.

Londoners are much less likely to be troubled by immigration since London is one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world. It is also a very wealthy place with much more access to opportunity, and public transport that actually works (when it's not on strike) - and though there are poor people in London, they don't stay poor forever, unlike out in the provinces. It is a city with much more going on, with more things to do, there are fewer reasons to be as angry.

Compare that with the North and things look a little different. Immigration is much more noticeable and much more polarised, poverty is entrenched and sustained, the weather is always crap - and as for education... Let's not go there. While London copes well with the decisions made by London, the very worst consequences of those decisions are always felt most acutely by the rest of the country.

What does a Londoner care if a London politician signs away more Scottish fishing quotas? What does a Londoner care if their renewable energy future means plastering the Welsh hills with ugly wind turbines? They are out of sight and out of mind.  It is little wonder then that revolutions and uprisings happen to the capital rather than from the capital.

London is slowly growing apart from the rest of the UK both economically and culturally. It sucks up most of the talent from the regions and bleeds them dry of culture. London is thriving yet Birmingham and Glasgow, each great cities in their own right, are struggling when they shouldn't be. This has everything to do with the centralisation of power. Policy is devised in London, by London, for London.

It's ultimately about power. Power attracts wealth, youth and media - and so in the Uk, it goes to London. Because media especially follows power, our media is wholly London-centric - and to our chatterati, there is only London - and then everything else. They are completely ignorant of the vast and wonderful country that lies North of Watford Gap, often having more familiarity with other European capitals than their own country. We don't call them the "metro-elite" for nuffink.

Those of us who live outside the M25 look in on London as though it were on a different planet. And it might as well be. Perhaps it is not that Ukip performed badly in London, rather it did better everywhere else for the above reasons.

As I have outlined today, at the root of that of Ukip's anger is the fundamental lack of democracy in the UK. While that same lack of democracy exists in London, the decisions made in London are addressed to London and the rest of the country suffers because of it. To address that democratic imbalance we de-Londonise power in the UK, and by consequence it will de-Londonise media, culture and politics. If media follows power then there's little wonder the media does not look elsewhere, for there is no power outside of London.

Our local authorities need to be constitutional bodies exercising all powers of legislation, taxation and administration so that government serves the people rather than vice versa. That cannot be done by simply leaving the EU, nor can it be done by electing a different bunch of people to operate in Westminster. We need something wholly different. We need The Harrogate Agenda.

More than a protest or impotent rage?

If you are not voting for something, you are voting against something. And Ukip isn't a vote for something. Ask any Ukip voter why they voted Ukip and the replies are diverse.  In fact those who would say first off the bat "because I want Britain to leave the EU" are probably now in the minority.

Reasons for voting Ukip are as diverse as wind farms, speed cameras, political correctness, HS2, MPs expenses, human rights law protecting criminals, parking tickets, BBC bias through to immigration. If anything the EU has taken a back seat and Ukip has become a uniting banner in what has become a culture war against an establishment that simply does not listen and is entirely self-serving. The EU is a part of that sentiment but it is no longer the driving force behind Ukip. People are pissed off - and have every right to be.

A recent survey shows that Ukip voters are more likely to be angry.  And angry people protest. Throughout the land there is a prevailing sense of voter impotence. We vote but it apparently changes little. But who cares? We live in a first world, developed economy with unprecedented access to wealth and opportunity so what is there to really complain about?

It's really quite simple. We humans have a fundamental need to exert some kind of control over our surroundings. I don't recall being asked if I wanted entirely pointless traffic lights at the top of my street. I don't recall asking for a street light outside my house. I don't recall the council being consulted over the smoking ban. I didn't ask for a recycling bin and I wasn't consulted as to whether I wanted separate food waste disposal. They assumed I would want it, then I was told to it, then through threats of fines and forfeitures, I was forced to.

I could of course complain to my councillor but this is merely the council doing as it is instructed by Whitehall, who is in turn merely obeying the European Waste Framework Directive. Somewhere, an unelected individual decided how I must live, in an institute so remote that most people couldn't find it on a map - and one I don't have a voice in at any level. This is now about democracy - or the complete absence of it.

Somewhere along the line we stopped being citizens and became livestock to be managed by people appointed over us, who we must pay for, without ever having consented - and without democratic recourse. To even question the wisdom of our rulers is impertinent. Our complaints go into a black hole, and while we can vote in another councillor, we cannot fire the council CEOcracy who stay in post for years, accumulating obscene pensions and payouts.

Just recently I was convicted of criminal damage. The short version being that I refused to pay my council tax as a protest, but also with a view to catching bailiffs in the act of unlawfully inflating fees. As predicted, that is what happened. Complaints were not upheld by the council (though they refused to investigate), the police point-blank refused to act, and so, after I paid my council tax directly to the council, bailiffs clamped my car demanding that I pay their unlawful fees.

I cut it the clamp off with an angle-grinder. I then made a complaint to the police and they then charged me for criminal damage - and refused to examine the evidence of fee-fraud. I am now a convicted criminal - and the state sanctioned fraudsters walk free.

While waiting to be heard by the judge I got talking with a man who was fighting a similar battle over a parking ticket that had somehow been inflated to over £800.  I told him that I had refused to pay council tax. He shook my hand and smiled. He remarked "This is why I'm voting Ukip".

From the NHS, through to council services and the police, there is a prevailing cynicism that complaining is pointless because they will not act, they will not admit fault - and they will not listen.  We are simply issued a complaint number and become just another statistic in the system.

They close down local hospitals and police stations, against our wishes, becoming more centralised, anonymous and remote, and their idea of democracy is a single police commissioner to preside over regions with over two million residents. British "democracy" is a joke.

And for all these "efficiencies", somehow the direction of travel for taxes is always upward. Gradually, services we pay for with taxes are becoming fee-based so we are now paying twice for everything. What we think matters not. Our only purpose is to pay, pay what we are told - and to pay when we are told to pay it. The nature of council tax is that you are not a free individual unless you pay for your freedom. You are out of jail on license - and your crime against the state is to have a roof over your head.  

We are told our obedience is demanded because we have empty voting rituals every few years which  supposedly mean we can change our dictators. But still nothing changes. You can protest by disobedience, but they will bankrupt you. You can beat another citizen or steal from another citizen and walk free, but one thing the state will not tolerate is citizen who stands tall and says no to them.  They will relentlessly wear you down at at great expense, both to the citizen and the state, until you know your place.

Thus we have become an obedient, bovine nation afraid to say no because it is simply too much trouble to try. Thus we are serfs, not citizens.  All we have is our impotent rage with which we can toddle off to the voting booth and place our X in the box marked Ukip. The protest you are allowed to have. But it is an empty gesture appointing yet more overpaid politicians to a remote parliament that has no power to speak of. If anything a vote in that election gratifies that very fig-leaf of democracy - and is taken as a mandate to continue their oppression.

We can express our displeasure at the ballot box and that will gradually grow parties like Ukip so that token adjustments are made, but it's still pretty much business as usual for the establishment. Voting in itself is not a exercise of power (in that the levers of power in Strasbourg are not connected to anything), thus there are in fact only two types of vote - a mandate or a protest. 

Voting is not an expression of people power, it is merely an opinion poll. All we can do is communicate a sentiment through that poll, since who we elect is of no practical consequence to the output of that institution. 

The protest vote in that poll may be large, but not large enough - and ultimately we will never persuade the majority who did not vote that their vote matters - because we know they are right. The game is rigged, the system does not allow for democracy, and a protest vote is taken as a mandate for government to do more.

By this point, the obvious conclusion is that our rulers don't get the message, have not listened and are not going to. The very obvious reply to this is to rise up and slaughter every last one of them - but none of us really wants to do that. Violent uprisings are unpleasant affairs. So what is to be done?

We have seen that voting accomplishes little, and what good is a protest if our voice is not heeded? In a system where a vote is not a powerful act, we are then in the position of asking rather than demanding. This is where I part company with Ukip and the likes. I am done asking. I am now demanding.

We know what Ukip are against. But does it have a proposal? Does it have a roadmap?  Not that I can see.  It is merely a vocal expression of impotent rage. Ukip says it will scrap wind farms and scrap parking fees and deal with the BBC and abolish human rights law etc, but swatting the symptoms does not cure the disease.

I do not want Ukip to act on my behalf anymore than I want another party to act on my behalf.  It is not that the wrong party is in charge. It is that any party is in charge. A system where a party holds power is a system where the people do not, thus by definition that system is not (and cannot be) democratic. It is the system that corrupts both politicians and parties. Consequently we must dispense with that system entirely. You cannot vote to ask the establishment for democracy.

Ukip has grown by playing the establishment game by establishment rules. In order to grow it has had to play by the unwritten rules, and the bigger it gets the more it starts to look like the others. Nigel Farage does not represent me any more than Nick Clegg does. I am an individual with a voice of my own. I cannot be represented. If there is a decision to be made that affects me, I want a vote in that. I demand a vote in that. If we can put lottery terminals in every post office and off license, then we can employ that same technology for governance.

The state has no automatic right to take my money and spend it without asking. It has no automatic right to put limits on my life. To act with authority, it must act with consent. Thus we must have democracy. To say we need to restore democracy is to assume we ever had it. We have not - but we need it now more than ever. That is why we need The Harrogate Agenda. We are not asking. We demand it.

Monday, 26 May 2014

The Farage Mirage


In 2009, what Ukip calls the "LibLabCon" won 57.1% of the vote. This time... 56.21%  So it's pretty much business as usual for the establishment. The anti-EU vote is not eating into the establishment mandate. All it has done is cannibalise the BNP vote. By what measure this constitutes a political earthquake I really don't know. 

But this fact will escape our brain-dead media and will not stop them filing acres of equally brain-dead copy. Anyone capable of any serious analysis will be looking for the nearest cave to hide in until the white noise dissipates. The notion that the anti-EU vote is stagnating is news the faithful are not receptive to. Their response is to attack. I've been called some interesting names by Ukippers today for pointing this out - and have actually been called a communist!

We are in the age of political media fiction. The fiction where David Cameron used the veto, the fiction of the Ukraine "trade deal" and the "unprovoked Russian invasion". Now we get the fiction of the "Ukip surge".  Curiously Ukippers are keen to point out such fictions exist, but not when the fiction suits their own beliefs. 

So as much as the media will be insufferable for the next few days, if you were hoping for any intelligent discourse from the average Ukipper, forget it. The narrative has been written and the truth shall wither on the vine.  We are not looking at a political party, we are looking at a belief system and a cult. Ukippers have shelved their critical faculties for the foreseeable future.

Gove: Clearing out the rot?

Michael Gove is once again not flavour of the month in education circles having ejected such works from the GCSE curriculum as To Kill A Mockingbird, Of Mice and Men, The Great Gatsby, The Crucible, Catcher in the Rye, Death of a Salesman, The Bell Jar and Huckleberry Finn. 

I have occasionally attempted to read such works but ultimately my brain capsizes from boredom. It's not good stuff in the main, but year on year, yet another generation is forced to go through the ritual forensic autopsy of tedious, leaden prose - and be expected to regurgitate predetermined conclusions on demand. It is difficult to see the value.

It cannot said that it encourages critical thinking. Just look at the product of our education system - particularly those who work in the academic establishment. We need a big change, but it is politically incorrect and a major social faux pas to say this literature is eye-wateringly dull.

Classic literature proponents remind me of those middle-aged obsessive prog-rock bores who think kids should put down their techno records, and instead listen to the greatest hits of Pink Floyd; they who think their particular tastes make them the rightful arbiters of what constitutes good music. It's snobbery pure and simple. I doubt we could get kids to listen to music any more than we can get them to read if such people were ramming Yes albums down their throats.

Call me a philistine but the works of Brontë are little more than trashy romance fiction, only extended gravitas by way of being old. I also see no value at all in forcing kids to pick apart the self-indulgent, miserablist navel-gazing of Sylvia Plath. She'd have done the world a great service by gassing herself a lot sooner. There is a whole world of positive literature out there - and it's about time the curriculum was shaken up a little.

By clearing all this boring toss off the curriculum it essentially shit-cans all the liberal academics whose world-view and life experience extends little further than this narrow collection of texts. And that is no bad thing.  Though it's too bad that Gove isn't going the whole hog.  He is instead replacing such texts with similar ones more in keeping with his own stunted horizons, so it's not much of an improvement.

However, while this is a small step in the right direction, I can't really celebrate in that this is still a political intervention at a national level. Lefties can hardly complain at Gove making political interventions when that is all the Left have ever done. Political intervention is a natural consequence of education policy dictated by Whitehall.  If we want to end that cycle we must move past the specious notion that we need a national curriculum at all.

Ukip: not much of an earthquake


Here is what I predicted last Thursday: 
"Looking at the latest YouGov poll which puts Ukip on 27% (with a 3% margin of error), if we're generous and give Ukip the whole 27%, all it has accomplished in light of the BNP collapse since 2009 is to cannibalise that vote - and the English Democrat vote - along with an interception of old Labour votes that would otherwise go to the BNP.  It has not expanded the disaffection base by more than about 2% at best. So what we're looking at here is the Farage Mirage. It has united the protest vote by deliberately hollowing itself out of policy and principle."
So I was a little out. The protest vote has shifted by just over 3% with over 55% of the vote going to the establishment parties. I have often said there was a glass ceiling for a protest vote and it certainly doesn't look like the glass has cracked. With Ukip finishing last in local elections, it is difficult to substantiate any claims that there has been a political earthquake.

Notably, the Lib Dem vote has moved to Labour, but that was to be expected. For there to have been a major political earthquake there would need to be a swing of that scale moving from one of the establishment parties to Ukip.  That has not happened. It would be churlish to say that Ukip has not made a splash, but we should not lose sight of the objectives. The people are no closer to the levers of power, and we are no closer to leaving the EU.  

With Farage now announcing his wish to destroy the Tories, the Ukip effect might well mean we don't get that referendum in 2017. Farage has clearly bought the hype that there will be a political earthquake at the general election on this basis of this poll and is playing to win. It won't happen. Not ever.

The most realistic scenario is that Ukip will score one or two MP's and stop a Tory win. That may be no bad thing. A Tory loss in a general election may well prove a positive development in order to delay a referendum until the referendum margins look better, but with Farage and Ukip representing the case for leaving the EU, that doesn't look likely either. So for all the white noise, again I ask... what does this Ukip "tidal wave" achieve?

A few Ukip MP's at the general election would certainly be a political event, but were we to transpose the swing of 3% onto a general election, unless Ukip has an ace up its sleeve, that doesn't look at all realistic. A year is a long time in politics and there is still everything to play for, but I suspect what we will see is a further hollowing out of Ukip - whose apparent strategy is now to win power at Westminster with no interim objectives.  By then people will be asking serious questions of Ukip to which it has no serious answers. We are looking at a party that has no policies to speak of, and no agenda for power. Thus it has nowhere to go.

What we don't want is yet another empty party pulling at the levers of power. Especially not a reactionary populist one. That is not change for the better. Thankfully we have the FPTP system to prevent precisely that - and if we want real democracy we will have to come back with something more substantive to offer. As abysmal as the establishment parties are, I think I prefer the status quo in the absence of a well defined alternative. The polls will show I am not alone in thinking that.

What the Ukip experiment will show when it finally fizzles out is that the system is designed to prevent people taking real power.  We can voice our protest but a protest is all it is. Winning seats in euro-elections and councils does not equate with winning power.  If we want power for ourselves we shall have to take it by other means.

Saturday, 24 May 2014

I am a criminal


Yesterday I was convicted of criminal damage.  The short version being that I refused to pay my council tax for a number of perfectly valid reasons, but also with a view to catching bailiffs in the act of unlawfully inflating fees. As predicted, that is what happened. But in late 2012, when I paid my council tax, the bailiffs clamped my car, demanding that I pay their unlawful fees. I cut it off with an angle-grinder. I made a complaint to the police and they then charged me for criminal damage - and refused to examine the evidence of fee-fraud. I complained to the council and they also upheld the unlawful fees, without investigating.

I represented myself at the magistrates courts and kept the proceedings running for a full day. I failed.  Yesterday it finally went to appeal and I failed yet again.  But we did establish that the bailiff firm, Rundle & Co did inflate their fees unlawfully. This is what happened.